https://kors.top/template/a/www.industrysuper.com
 
Skip to Main Content
 

UK Race Track Bookies Conspire to Rip Off Bettors, Says Whistle Blower


On-track bookies in the regularly collude to increase the vigorish at events they expect to be largely attended by inexperienced gamblers. That’s according to one on-track bookmaker, who admits he has taken part in such activity in the past but now “deplores” the practise.

Andy Smith of Festival Racing blows whistle on on-track bookiesAndy Smith of Festival Racing claims that collusion among on-track bookmakers is becoming more common. Bookies will regularly offer poor prices on events where they expect a large number of clueless bettors to gather. (Image: Edward Whitaker/Racing Post)

Andy Smith, who takes bets as ‘Festival Racing,’ told newspaper that bookmakers often agree before the racing begins to price up their books in a way that will leave more naive customers short-changed.

His comments came in the wake of a report by the Horseracing Bettors Forum that found particularly bad odds had been offered at the Welsh racetrack Ffos Las at an event marketed as “Ladies Day.”

Cooking the Books

While it’s generally accepted by bettors that all bookmakers give themselves a mathematical edge when they price up their books, some edges are greater than others.

In fixed-odds bookmaking, the sum of the probabilities quoted for any given race will always exceed 100 percent. Everything over the 100 percent mark equates to the bookmaker’s theoretical profit.

Normally, they can’t get too greedy because experienced gamblers will do the math, realize they’re getting a raw deal and move on. In a competitive betting market, the margin should be under 2 percent for each runner, but it appears the bookies at Ffos Las felt that the Ladies Day attendees might be not be so perceptive.

Practise Widespread

“Because there’s not many bookies,” Smith said, “it was easy to arrange, let’s think of a word for it … a cartel. A bookie would come and ask you, one of the other bookies. They might say, we’ll do 3 percent the first couple of races, then we’re betting 4 percent.

You might not believe this, but this is not a thing that happens only at Ffos Las. It’s happening more and more.”

Smith says that collusion is more likely to be found in “satellite” betting spots, away from the main betting area.

Mark Kershaw, director at Ffos Las, told The Guardian he was “disappointed” in the bookmakers at his racetrack.

“We try hard to get the racegoers there and it needs everybody at the racecourse to pull together to make sure they want to come back again and have a good experience,” he said.

“I think it was a day when there was a holiday crowd and they thought: ‘We can take advantage,’ but that’s completely wrong. What we want is that holiday crowd to want to come back again. It shouldn’t be an opportunity to short-change them.”

What's your question?

warning Your question will be sent directly to the fund you select

Talk to someone who knows how to help

warning Your question will be sent directly to the fund you select

  • You will be called back at the next available opportunity.

Thank you for your enquiry

An error has occurred

Due to a technical fault we are unable to to submit your form at the moment. Please try again later.

Additional details:

Betting Odds Boards Light Up for French Presidential Duel Between Macron, Le Pen  Nevada Casinos Top $1B for Seventh Straight Month, Set September Gaming Record  Red Rock Sitting on Treasure Trove of Stadium Land, Says Analyst  Scotland on Brink of Greyhound Racing Ban  UK Regulator Cracks Down on Hot and Cold Game Advertisements  New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu Tells Boston Radio Station Sports Betting Will Start By January  Football Index Facing UK Government Inquiry into ‘Flawed’ Business Model  Penn National, Other Sports Betting Equities Slide After NFL Reveals Titans Coronavirus Cases  Nevada Online Poker Blacklist Bill Dead in State Legislature  Pennsylvania Casinos Could Go Smokeless If New Legislation Becomes Law